Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
228-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

228-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028498 50.866552)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028470 50.866549,-1.028471 50.866555,-1.028475 50.866560,-1.028481 50.866564,-1.028498 50.866567,-1.028515 50.866564,-1.028521 50.866560,-1.028525 50.866555,-1.028527 50.866549,-1.028526 50.866544,-1.028522 50.866539,-1.028508 50.866532,-1.028499 50.866531,-1.028490 50.866532,-1.028476 50.866538,-1.028472 50.866543,-1.028470 50.866549)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL